The evidence showed that there was no rationale to suspect fraud by the small donee or connivance with earnings officials. Dispute Around Ownership: One of several plaintiffs claimed being the only operator of your suit land, which had been still left with one of several defendants as ‘Amanat’ (on belief) https://illegalencroachmentslawye52657.blogzag.com/75310278/the-best-side-of-best-property-lawyer-in-karachi